|Year : 2009 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 47-50
An experience of community mental health program in rural areas of Jharkhand
Shantna Kumari1, SN Mishra2, S Chaudhury3, Amool R Singh4, AN Verma5, Sangeeta Kumari6
1 Department of PSW, RINPAS, Hazaribagh, India
2 Sociologist, NTPC, Rehabilitation Unit, Hazaribagh, India
3 Department of Psychiatry, RINPAS, Delhi, India
4 Department of Clinical Psychology, RINPAS, Delhi, India
5 Department of Psychiatric Social Work, RINPAS, Delhi, India
6 Psychiatric Social Worker, IHBAS, Delhi, India
|Date of Web Publication||3-Dec-2009|
Department of PSW, RINPAS, Kanke, Ranchi-834006, Jharkhand
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: In the present era, mental disability is a major public health problem in the society. Many of the mental disabilities are correctable if detected early. Objectives: To assess the prevalence and pattern of mental disability. Materials and Methods: Community-based cross-sectional study. Patients of all age groups in the age range of 0-60 years were randomly selected from 10 blocks of 2 districts, viz., Ranchi and Hazaribagh. Thirty villages from each block were taken for the study. The study was conducted by making house-to-house visits, interviewing and examining all the individuals in the families selected using pre-tested questionnaire. Statistical Analysis: It was done by the proportions. Results and Conclusion: The prevalence of mental disability was found higher among males (67.9%) than among females (32.1%). The prevalence rate was higher among the productive groups and among individuals with low socioeconomic status. There is scope of community-based rehabilitation of the mentally disabled.
Keywords: Community-based rehabilitation, Mental illness, Prevalence, Rural community
|How to cite this article:|
Kumari S, Mishra S N, Chaudhury S, Singh AR, Verma A N, Kumari S. An experience of community mental health program in rural areas of Jharkhand. Ind Psychiatry J 2009;18:47-50
Mental disorders are prevalent in people of all regions, countries and societies. They affect men and women at all stages of life. Contrary to popular belief, the poor are more likely to suffer from mental and behavioral disorders (The World Health Report, 2001) and are more likely to suffer tragic outcomes as a result of their illness. The National Mental Health Program was developed in India to address the problem of mental illnesses, especially in rural areas. However, it has come under some criticism as it has laid emphasis on identifying and treating severe mental disorders such as psychosis, while not addressing common mental disorders [CMDs], which are equally disabling. CMDs, which are neurotic disorders presenting with anxiety and depressive symptoms, are widespread and are known to cause significant disability worldwide. In India, prevalence rates of CMD range from 2% to 57% (Patel, 1999). Majority of patients with CMDs present at primary care centers but end up receiving symptomatic treatments like painkillers and vitamins because their disorders are not recognized by primary care physicians as being mental illnesses. CMDs in such patients lead to chronic disability and progress in severity, making ultimate treatment more difficult (Issac et al., 2005). World Health Organization estimates that 10% of the world's population has mental disabilities, and 1% suffers from severe incapacitating mental disorders. The disability-adjusted life year (DALY) loss due to neuropsychiatric disorders is much higher than that due to diarrhea, malaria, worm infestations and tuberculosis if taken individually. According to estimates, DALYs lost due to mental disorders are expected to represent 15% of the global burden of diseases by 2020.
During the last two decades, many epidemiological studies conducted in India show that the prevalence of major psychiatric disorders is about the same all over the world. The prevalences reported from these studies range from 18 to 207 per 1000 of the population, with a median of 65.4 per 1000; and at any given time, about 2% to 3% of the population suffer from seriously incapacitating mental disorders or epilepsy. A meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of psychiatric disorders was around 5.8% (Reddy et al., 1998). Most of these patients live in rural areas, remote from any modern mental health facilities. A large number of adult patients (10.4%-53%) coming to the general OPD are diagnosed as being mentally ill. However, these patients are usually missed because either the medical officer or the general practitioner at the primary health care unit does not ask detailed mental health history. Due to the under-diagnosis of these patients, unnecessary investigations and treatments are offered, which put a heavy financial burden on the patients.
The Mental Health Act 1987 provides safeguards against stigmatization of patients suffering from mental illness. Community care of the chronic mentally ill has always been prevalent in India, largely due to family involvement and unavailability of institutions. In the 80s, a few mental health clinics became operational in some parts of the country. The Schizophrenia Research Foundation (SCARF), an NGO in Chennai, had established a community clinic in 1989 in Thiruporur, which was functional till 1999. Community mental health rehabilitation programs are carried out in a rural area in Jharkhand by the Nab Bharat Jagriti Kendra (NBJK), a nongovernmental, nonprofit organization working for people with physical and mental disabilities. The community mental health project is funded by Action Aid, India, and is carried out in Ranchi and Hazaribagh districts of Jharkhand. Covering 30 villages from 10 blocks, this area has a total population of 433,657 persons, most of them below the poverty line. One primary health center (PHC) and a few sub-centers cater to the health needs of the population. In these rural communities, faith healing and traditional medicines for mental illnesses are quiet popular and these traditional healers often are the first point of contact. The present study was conducted to understand the prevalence rate of mental disability and for developing community-based rehabilitation programs for the mentally ill.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This was a community-based cross-sectional study carried out over a period from January 2005 to December 2005. This study was conducted at the rural field of a nongovernmental organization Nab Bharat Jagriti Kendra, which covers a population of 1,332,739 spread over 10 blocks in the state of Jharkhand, India. A favorable sex ratio (Male: Female - 1000: 941) and literacy rate 54.1% in males and 39.45% were the striking features of this area. Mostly tribal people live in these areas. Two districts Ranchi and Hazaribagh and 5 blocks from each of these districts were chosen for the study. The sample size was estimated to be 433,657 persons. The study was conducted by making house-to-house visits and interviewing all the individuals in the families selected using a pre-tested questionnaire. Mental disability was assessed by 'disability evaluation and assessment scale' (IDEAS), a scale for measuring and quantifying disability in mental disorders, developed by the Rehabilitation Specialty Section of Indian Psychiatric Society (Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Govt. of India, 2002). Disability in children below the age of 5 years was assessed based on a questionnaire designed on the lines of questionnaire taken from Action Aid India. Action Aid India instrument is used for the assessment of mental disability of a child. Children were examined and developmental delay in responding to the name or voice, smile, communication; and learning difficulties were noted down (Thomas et al., 2005). The data collected was tabulated by using proportions. Findings were described in terms of percentages. After knowing the status of mental illness, community-based rehabilitation program as under was planned and implemented.
The mental health program
The primary objective was to operate a community-based mental health program in the defined catchment areas. The other program components included capacity-building program to detect mental disorders and make referrals for mental disorders, as well as linkages from government mental hospitals; awareness programs; services delivery; and rehabilitation programs.
The community-based rehabilitation workers (CBRWs) were lay volunteers identified from the community with the help of Gram Sabha. The training consisted of 10 sessions each for the 10 groups of CBRWs. Other groups like Person with disability (PWD) self-help group (18), panchayat-level PWD communities (20), block-level PWD communities (2) and district-level PWD community (1) were formed and given training regarding mental illness and mental disabilities. They helped in identifying the case, implementation of simple intervention strategies, working closely with families of the mentally ill and making appropriate referrals. Manual and audiovisual training materials were used for the sessions.
The awareness-building program included community sensitization camps, street plays, wall writing, pamphlets, posters, letters and booklet distribution containing all information related to, and meeting the needs of, disabled people in the catchment area of study.
Sensitization and workshops
Several sensitization programs and workshops for key players, i.e., ANM (Auxillary Nurse Midwife), media, block administration BDOs (Block Development Officer), MOs (Medical Officer), CDPOs (Child Development Project Officer), other NGOs, school teachers, physicians and other medical officers, parents, village leaders, were conducted during the Mental Health Program.
Mental health services
The identified patients and disabled were linked to the Ranchi Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Allied Sciences (RINPAS), Ranchi. They visited the patients with the help of CBRWs, and further checkup was done by psychiatrists and psychiatric social workers and the progress was reviewed monthly. A similar procedure was followed in camps held in villages which were not accessible to the clinic staff. Some psycho-social intervention included support to the patient, educating families on mental illness, management of behavioral problems, ensuring drug compliance, training patients in self care and daily living, job placements and helping them initiate small businesses as a measure of rehabilitation. The emphasis was on utilizing local resources and mobilizing local support. Over a period of 2 years, 2003-20053026 , patients suffering from mental illness were registered and offered treatment; and by the end of the programs, 2112 patients were on medication, 585 were stable and 329 were self employed (rehabilitated). When we made our exit from the project area in 2005, we were quite satisfied with the pace of the activities we had initiated. Our major successes were as follows: Due to the mental health facilities in the region, there are now 3 mental hospitals run by government and a private body. RINPAS also has done camps in the remote areas and given free treatment and medication. This will help the patients to continue medication and come for follow-up.
| Results|| |
The prevalence of disability was the highest in the age groups 30-34 years and 20-24 years, which was significantly higher than the prevalence in other age groups. Among 1432 patients of psychosis, 269 had depression and anxiety, 503 had mental retardation, 358 had epilepsy and 464 had substance abuse or dependence. The total number of disabled individuals was 3026, among whom 1855 were males and 823 were females. The difference in prevalence of disability seen in males (67.9%) and females (32.1%) was not statistically significant. The overall prevalence of mental disability was 1% to 2% [Table 1].
The prevalence of disability was the lowest in the high socioeconomic group; except in case of mental retardation, which was higher in the high socioeconomic group. More males than females had psychosis and substance-dependence-related problems, whereas more females than males had problems of depression and anxiety [Table 2] and [Table 3].
| Discussion|| |
Well-documented studies to determine the prevalence and pattern of mental disorders are few. There are no community- based studies using IDEAS for assessment of disability, but there are some hospital-based studies among patients with mental illness and mental disability using IDEAS. This instrument was used for mental illnesses that included schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorders, anxiety disorders, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorders, dementia, behavioral disorders due to the intake of alcohol (Chaudhury et al., 2006; Mohan et al., 2005). The field workers involved in data collection could not detect mild degrees of disability because of their limited knowledge and lack of training. The present study showed a higher prevalence of mental disability in general (Chaudhury et al., 2006). The prevalence was more common among the productive age group. This has been attributed to higher prevalence due to socioeconomic conditions, marital and familial problems and substance abuse. Higher prevalence of mental disabilities in males is probably due to nonrespondent females. Moreover, family members often hide female patients with mental illness due to stigma. The prevalence of mental disability was the lowest among the group of persons with high socioeconomic status. In this area, the disabled were educated up to the primary level. About a third of the 7 to 8 million Indians who suffer from psychosis will be severely disabled and will require intense rehabilitation inputs (Census of India, 2001). The moderately disabled also require intervention, largely in relation to work and employment. After knowing the status of mental illness, community-based rehabilitation program was planned and implemented.
Jharkhand is rich in local resources like agriculture, forest and minerals, and so patients who improved with treatment and engaged in field or local business tended to drop out of follow up. But dropping out of psychiatric care is not an uncommon phenomenon, especially in the case of chronic mental illness. Several studies, including our own, have addressed this issue, while some have reported more dropouts among patients whose condition improved and who were satisfied with the level of care (Rossi et al., 2002). The contradictory finding of persons dropping out because of lack of improvement was seen in other studies (Rossi et al., 2002). Our own follow-up study revealed that those patients who had remitted had dropped out (Thara et al., 1990). This program has succeeded to an extent in attaining the objectives of the National Mental Health Program. Minimum mental health care is made accessible, available and affordable to the underprivileged sections of the population. Community health workers can play an important role in disseminating correct information regarding these disorders to the community and in reducing stigma. There are usually many myths and misconceptions associated with severe mental disorders in rural areas, and these are very resistant to change. However, the cure of one such patient in a village is enough to change people's attitudes.
A limitation of our study was that we could not interview nonrespondents because of their noncooperation or non-availability during our field visits; hence the entire population could not be covered.
| Conclusion|| |
Common mental disorders form a large proportion of the total burden of mental illnesses and must be addressed in all mental health programs. Collaboration between the Departments of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Social Work and NGOs is useful in developing such programs at the primary care level. In our initiative, postgraduate students of both departments got an opportunity to view the entire spectrum of mental illnesses and study the social, economic and cultural factors that were intertwined with them.
| References|| |
|1.||Chaudhury. P. K., Deka, K.,& Chetia, D. (2006). Disability associated with mental disorders, Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 48: 95-101. |
|2.||Census of India 2001. Data on disability office of the registrar general updated on Aug.92004., New Delhi: Government of India. |
|3.||Isaacs, A. N., Srinivasan, K., Neerakkal, I.,& Jayaram, G. (2005). Initiating a Community Mental Health Programme in Rural Karnataka. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 31(2):204-206. |
|4.||Mental Health, Tenth plan (2002-2007). Planning commission. New Delhi: Govt. of Delhi; 126-127. |
|5.||Ministry of Social justice and empowerment (2002). Guidelines for evaluation and assessment of mental illness and procedure of certification. Ministry of Social justice and empowerment, Govt. of India, New Delhi. |
|6.||Mohan, I., Tandon, R., Kalra, H.,& Trivedi, J. K. (2005). Disability assessment in mental disability using Indian Disability Evaluation Assessment Scale (IDEAS). Indian Journal of Medical Research, 121:759-63. |
|7.||Padmavati, R. (2005). Community mental health care in India. International Review of Psychiatry, 17(2):103-107. |
|8.||Patel, V. (1999). The epidemiology of common mental disorders in South Asia. NIMHANS Journal, 17:307-327. |
|9.||Reddy, M. V.,& Chandrasekher, C. R. (1998). Prevalence of mental and behavioral disorders in India. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 40(2):149-157. |
|10.||Rossi, A., Amaddeo, F., Sandri, M., Marcello, A., Bianco, M.,& Tansella, M. (2007). What happens to patients seen only once by psychiatric services? Findings from a follow-up study. European Psychiatry, 22(1):330-331. |
|11.||Thara, R.,& Rajkumar, S. (1990). A study of sample attrition in follow- up of schizophrenia. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 32(3):217- 222. |
|12.||Thara, R. (2005). Measurement of psychiatric disability. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 121:723-724. |
|13.||Thara, R.,& Padmavathi, R. (1999). A community Mental Health Programme in rural Tamilnadu; Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 10(1):2-11. |
|14.||Thomas, M.,& Pruthvish, S. (2002) Identification and needs assessment of beneficiaries of community based rehabilitation initiatives, Action Aid India: Bangalore. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Predictors of maternal psychological distress in rural India: A cross-sectional community-based study
| ||Audrey Prost,Rashmi Lakshminarayana,Nirmala Nair,Prasanta Tripathy,Andrew Copas,Rajendra Mahapatra,Shibanand Rath,Raj Kumar Gope,Suchitra Rath,Aparna Bajpai,Vikram Patel,Anthony Costello |
| ||Journal of Affective Disorders. 2012; 138(3): 277 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|