|Year : 2012 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 1-3
Women and mental health: Psychosocial perspective
Scientist ‘F’, Department of Psychiatry, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune - 411040, India
|Date of Web Publication||22-Apr-2013|
Scientist 'F', Department of Psychiatry,Armed Forces Medical College,Pune - 411 040, Maharashtra
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Srivastava K. Women and mental health: Psychosocial perspective. Ind Psychiatry J 2012;21:1-3
The World Health Organization's Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion sees health as multidimensional and espouses a social model of health. It defines health as 'a positive concept emphasizing social and personal resources, as well as physical capacities.' 'Mental health is the capacity of the individual, the group and the environment to interact with one another in ways that promote subjective well-being, the optimal development and use of mental abilities (cognitive, affective, and relational), the achievement of individual and collective goals consistent with justice and the attainment and preservation of conditions of fundamental equality. 
Discussions on health issues pertaining to women have largely addressed the biological and reproductive factors. However, women's well-being is apparently beyond biological factors and reproduction. The issues like workload, stress, migration, and nutrition are equally important.  The gender perspective into the health sector requires a broad-based definition of health for women as well as men that address well-being across the life cycle and in domains of both physical and mental health.
Gender considerations in health promotion and healthcare have to highlight the mental health risks and the socioeconomic and cultural determinants of mental health. Apparently, economic independence, physical, sexual, and emotional safety and security are primarily needed for good mental health. Unfortunately, same are supposedly denied to some women by virtue of their status as women. Such gender-based discrimination is not only a gross violation of human rights but directly contributes to the growing burden of disability caused by poor mental health.
Hence, need of the hour is to discuss the association of these factors with mental health of women. In the context of Burden of Disease, it is estimated that depression will become the second most important cause of disease burden in the world by the year 2020. Women in developed and developing countries alike are almost twice as likely as men to experience depression. Other two leading causes of disease burden estimated for the year 2020, namely violence and self-inflicted injuries, have special relevance for women's mental health.  Let us try to examine some of the contributory factors and their association with mental health of women.
| Social Support and its Relationship With Mental Health|| |
Social support has long been considered to be having an impact on mental health of women. A study carried out by Coker et al.,  to find out mental health status of women found good social support was associated with significantly reduced risk of a range of adverse mental health outcomes and further that higher levels of emotional support can modify the effect of intimate partner violence on health. The study suggested that interventions to increase emotional and social support to women victims of violence might reduce the negative consequences of mental and physical health.
Violence against women is like an endemic in society. It is estimated that 14-20% of women will experience rape at some point in their lives,  and 8-24% will be stalked by someone known or unknown to them. When added to the 25-35% likelihood that the average adult woman has been sexually abused as a child. ,
| Social Learning Theory of Violence|| |
This theory asserts that human aggression and violence are learned conduct, especially through direct experience and by observing the behavior of others. According to this theory, the individual learns violence through imitation. Individuals pick up the behavior patterns of those they are taught to respect and learn from. Aggressive behavior patterns learned through modeling and imitation remain part of our repertoire of social responses over time. Rewards and punishments also play a crucial role in the learning and expression of behavior patterns.
| Symbolic Interaction Theory|| |
This theory specifies the process by which self-image and identity of a person as 'violent' are formed, and the process by which violent acts acquire individual and socially shared meaning. It explains the origin and maintenance of the structure of meaning that is necessary for all human social behavior, including violence. This perspective focuses its attention on the nature of interaction, the dynamic patterns of social action, and social relationships. It attempts to understand action as the participant himself understands it.
Violence in any form may entail harmful consequences. There is evidence of the long-term and deleterious effects of experiencing childhood violence in early years. The association that has emerged has indicated that witnessing childhood violence leads to poor mental health during woman's adult years. Childhood violence also has long-term psychological effects on women. Those women who had witnessed violence were found to be having depression and poor self esteem.  Further, women who experienced physical or sexual abuse in childhood also experienced ill-health with regard to physical functioning and psychological well-being as compared to other women. 
Mental health sequels to spousal violence are significant and have long-term health implications. Battered women were found to have more depressive symptoms than other women.  Studies have found the relationship between severity of abuse and physical and mental health. The attempts to quote figures though in India have revealed data on the prevalence, nature, and consequences of domestic violence. Davar's have attributed the rigidly defined roles of Indian women and expectations to be hurdle for growth. 
| Poverty and Poor Mental Health|| |
There seems to be a vicious cycle of adversities in the case of women. Women who were poor and those who were less educated were also found to be at increased risk of poor mental health. Women living in poverty are disproportionately affected by social exploitation. These women are faced with various types of social, physical, and economic hardships, which in association with the experience of domestic violence are likely to increase their vulnerability to mental morbidities.  Heise  postulated that poverty probably acts as a marker for a variety of social conditions that combine to increase the risk of violence faced by women. Women in better jobs than their husbands were also found to be at risk of poor mental health, a feature that is not unique to India. Counts et al.  found that where women have a higher economic status they are seen as having sufficient power to change traditional gender roles, and it is at this point that violence is at its highest. An interesting finding was that higher levels of education of both the woman and her husband acted as a protective buffer against poor mental health, suggesting the important part education could play in reducing violence against women and, thereby, mental disorder. Studies have indeed shown that low academic achievement was one of the risk factors predicting physical abuse of partners by men in New Zealand.  Domestic violence is a complex problem and there is no single strategy that will combat all the situations. Since ages, domestic violence against women and children in particular, continue to be one of crucial social mechanism, a result of varied power distribution between men and women.
The UN declaration of Elimination of Violence against Women rounds it up as any act of gender-based violence that results in or is likely to result in physical, sexual, or psychological harm or suffering to women.  A cross-sectional household survey was conducted in rural, urban, and urban-slum areas across seven sites in India, among women aged 15–49 years, living with a child less than 18 years of age. Trained field workers administered a structured questionnaire to elicit information on spousal physical violence. Out of 9,938 women surveyed, 26% reported experiencing spousal physical violence during the lifetime of their marriage. Higher socioeconomic status and good social support acted as protective buffers against spousal physical violence. The findings provide compelling evidence of the potential risk factors for spousal physical violence, which in turn could help in planning interventions. 
| Social Position, Poverty, and Health|| |
A strong inverse relationship exists between social position and physical and mental health outcomes. Adverse health outcomes are two to two and a half times higher amongst people in the most disadvantaged social position compared with those in the highest. ,, Such health differentials have been found in a number of countries including Finland, Norway, and Sweden.  The link between mental health and low income amongst urban women has also been documented in Bombay, Olinda, and Santiago.  Socioeconomic circumstances, social support and health-related behaviors all have independent effects on health, but cluster together and are mutually reinforcing.
Women have many strengths, and their major problems are not internal, personal deficiencies. Instead, the problems are primarily societal ones, such as sexism and racism. Equality of gender has been the prime concern across all ages of movements pertaining to justice for women. Women empowerment needs multimodal strategies. Protesting against exploitation is only one of the strategies. What is needed is social awareness and indoctrination of value system through community participation.
| References|| |
|1.||World Health Organization, Health and Welfare Canada. 1986. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion Canadian Public Health Association. |
|2.||Makosky V. Sources of stress: Events or conditions? In: Belle D, editor. Lives in Stress: Women and Depression. California: Sage Publications; 1982. p. 35-53. |
|3.||World Health Organization, Women's Mental Health: An Evidence Based Review 2000. |
|4.||Coker AL, Watkins KW, Smith PH, Brandt HM. Social support reduces the impact of partner violence on health: Application of structural equation models. Prev Med 2003;37:259-67. |
|5.||Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women 2000;6:142-61. |
|6.||Sheridan LP, Blaauw E, Davies GM. Stalking: Knowns and unknowns. Trauma Violence Abuse 2003;4:148-62. |
|7.||Spitzberg BH. The tactical topography of stalking victimization and management. Trauma Violence Abuse 2002;3:261-88. |
|8.||Silveryn L, Karyl J, Waelde L, Hodges WF, Starek J, Heidt E, et al. Retrospective reports of parental abuse: Relationships to depression, trauma symptoms and self-esteem among college students. J Fam Violence 1995;10:177-202. |
|9.||McCauley J, Kern DE, Kolodner K, Dill L, Schroeder AF, DeChant HK, et al. The 'battering syndrome': Prevalence and clinical characteristics of domestic violence in primary care internal medicine practices. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:737-46. |
|10.||Campbell JC, Lewandowski LA. Mental and physical health effects of intimate partner violence on women and children. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1997;20:353-74. |
|11.||Davar BV. Mental Health of Indian Women-A Feminist Agenda. New Delhi: Sage; 1999. |
|12.||Patel V, Araya R, de Lima M, Ludermir A, Todd C. Women, poverty and common mental disorders in four restructuring societies. Soc Sci Med 1999;49:1461-71. |
|13.||Heise L, Garcia-Moreno C. Violence by intimate partners. In: Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, editors. World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2002. p. 89-121. |
|14.||Counts DA, Brown JK, Campbell JC. Sanctions and sanctuary: Cultural Perspectives on the Beating of Wives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1992. |
|15.||Mofﬁtt TE, Robins RW, Caspi A. A couples analysis of partner abuse with implications for abuse prevention policy. Criminol Public Policy 2001;1:5-36. |
|16.||United Nations General Assembly Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women; 1993. |
|17.||Jeyaseelan L, Kumar S, Neelakantan N, Peedicayil A, Pillai R, Duvvury N. Physical spousal violence against women in India: Some risk factors. J Biosoc Sci 2007;39:657-70. |
|18.||Dohrenwend BP. Socioeconomic status (SES) and psychiatric disorders. Are the issues still compelling? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1990;25:41-7. |
|19.||Arnold F, Kishor S, Roy TK. Sex-Selective Abortion in India Popul Dev Rev 2002;28:759-85. |
|20.||Najman JM. Health and poverty: Past, present and prospects for the future. Soc Sci Med 1993;36:157-66. |
|21.||Rahkonen O, Lahelma E, Karisto A, Manderbacka K. Persisting health inequalities: Social class differentials in illness in the Scandinavian countries. J Public Health Policy 1993;14:66-81. |
|22.||Blue I, Ducci ME, Jaswal A, Ludermir B, Harpham T. The mental health of low income urban women: Case studies from Bombay, India; Olinda, Brazil; and Santiago, Chile: Urbanization and Mental Health in Developing Countries. In: Harpham T, Blue I, editors. Aldershot: Avebury; 1995. |